The Day After in Venezuela
Council Special Report from Latin America Studies Program
Council Special Report from Latin America Studies Program

The Day After in Venezuela

Delivering Security and Dispensing Justice

Venezuela represents the Western Hemisphere’s largest humanitarian crisis. Paul J. Angelo outlines what the United States can do to help alleviate the suffering of the Venezuelan people.

September 2020 , 44 Pages

Council Special Report
Concise policy briefs that provide timely responses to developing crises or contributions to current policy dilemmas.

“Since January 2019, U.S. policy toward Venezuela has centered on [President Nicolas] Maduro’s removal. The United States has advocated for a transitional government to facilitate a return to democracy,” writes Council on Foreign Relations Fellow for Latin America Paul J. Angelo in a new Council Special Report, The Day After in Venezuela: Delivering Security and Dispensing Justice. “The best-case scenario—and one that the United States endorses in its ‘Democratic Transition Framework for Venezuela’—would be a provisional government replacing Maduro and overseeing the transition to fresh presidential and legislative elections.”

Paul J. Angelo

Fellow for Latin America Studies

Angelo maintains that international actors have not planned enough for stabilizing the security environment and fostering transitional justice in a post-Maduro Venezuela. “Quickly establishing public order and reinstating the rule of law would be crucial for [U.S.] support to be effective. And only after it has revived institutions to credibly deliver security and dispense justice could Venezuela restore democratic governance,” Angelo explains.

More on:

Venezuela

Nicolas Maduro

Latin America

Political Transitions

South America

“The immediate aftermath of Maduro’s departure could see conflict among armed factions, unstable political coalitions, incentives for corruption and criminality, a divided international response, and an outflow of migrants and refugees,” he cautions.

“U.S. policymakers would need to anticipate the fallout from a transition, even under the most auspicious conditions, and identify opportunities to ensure that the transitional context begets the restoration of democracy,” he writes. These include:

  • “The United States should focus first on activities aimed at building trust with the Venezuelan authorities and people. . . . U.S. authorities should condition their support on the transitional government’s commitment to a democratic transition and to alleviating humanitarian suffering, while seeking points of entry that engender goodwill and create opportunities for deeper U.S. involvement in the country’s reconstruction.”
  • “In addition to working through the United Nations and [Organization of American States], the U.S. government should negotiate with potential spoilers of the transition outside Venezuela,” including China, Cuba, and Russia.
  • “The U.S. government should use its relationships with other governments in the hemisphere and in Europe that have sustained less hostile relations with Maduro to ensure that international assistance has a multilateral brand.”

“Maduro will leave behind a legacy of oppression, economic ruin, and raging insecurity,” Angelo warns. “Whether post-Maduro Venezuela devolves into anarchy and conflict, like Afghanistan, or follows the path to full democracy, like Chile, will depend on how Venezuelan authorities and its international partners manage the transition in its earliest days.”

Professors: To request an exam copy, contact [email protected]. Please include your university and course name.

More on:

Venezuela

Nicolas Maduro

Latin America

Political Transitions

South America

Bookstores: To order bulk copies, please contact Ingram. Visit https://ipage.ingramcontent.com, call 800.937.8200, or email [email protected]. Include ISBN: 978-0-87609-392-4.

Top Stories on CFR

Russia

Liana Fix, a fellow for Europe at CFR, and Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at CFR, sit down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the future of U.S. policy toward Russia and the risks posed by heightened tensions between two nuclear powers. This episode is the first in a special TPI series on the U.S. 2024 presidential election and is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Terrorism and Counterterrorism

Violence around U.S. elections in 2024 could not only destabilize American democracy but also embolden autocrats across the world. Jacob Ware recommends that political leaders take steps to shore up civic trust and remove the opportunity for violence ahead of the 2024 election season.

China

Those seeking to profit from fentanyl and governments seeking to control its supply are locked in a never-ending competition, with each new countermeasure spurring further innovation to circumvent it.